Monday, September 3, 2012
Online Fraud a New Banking Virus?
The advent of the Internet has led to a new set of problems of fraud related to the banking sector. In the past the problems resolved around, cash, credit cards and bounced checks. The result, the compensation process control becomes longer. The new 2-4-6 check clearing rules reflect the fact that the problem with bank fraud rose from checks online.
Banks in the United Kingdom have quietly approved an amendment to the code online banking, which could result in less protection for their customers online. The subtle change is the inclusion of a new clause 12.13. The clause provides that "If you have not acted fraudulently or without reasonable care (for example, not following the advice of 12.9), shall not be liable for losses caused by someone else that takes place through online banking. . "
The safeguard clause for the bank is 12.9, indicating that the clause is necessary to "use up-to-date antivirus software and spyware and personal firewall ..". The issue revolves around what is up-to-date and also what is antivirus software and spyware.
If your antivirus software is not updated when it then that is by its nature is not up-to-date. If you just turn on your PC once a week or so then in terms of anti-virus software would be very outdated. If you do not own a PC, but use one at work or in a cybercafe to carry out banking transactions on-line you have no control over anti-virus software, may still be liable for any losses from your account.
The clause is very ambiguous term such as antivirus and spyware software is very wide. They include a wide range of software to download for free services to more expensive monthly subscription. The reality is that most of this type of software struggles to keep pace with developments in online fraud. The fraudster to test their new virus and instruments of espionage against the current software to ensure that they can access the data they need to carry out fraud.
Are the banks simply admit defeat and shifting the burden from their systems to the consumer? You can still get home insurance with no security guards at your front door, but it seems that if the banks do not want to play by the same rules. Surely it should be down to the bank to ensure that it has systems that allow you to maintain security. The advent of third-party security keys was an attempt to solve this problem. The banking sector managed to shift the emphasis on consumer safety and the potential loss as well....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment